I can not understand a word in there, but I think the graph is a good universal language. Seems like the cheaper and lower-rated Intel® Pentium® D 805 goes toe-to-toe with the more expensive Athlon64* X2 3800+. It just goes to show how crappy their performance rating is.
Anyway, I am still skeptical with the results. Not that it's a good bragging link for fanboys, but I haven't tested an Athlon64 X2 3800+. I am able to compare Athlon64 X2 4xxx+ against Intel® Celeron® D/Cedar Mill though and the results are promising, too bad, can't post it =). Anyway, the article is here and you will need a trusty translator to understand it.