tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20218451.post115927976092926283..comments2023-10-30T22:14:47.193+08:00Comments on FanBoy TechWeb: Rant: Kenstfield’s Rival: AMD Athlon 64 FX-2Pdeath_metalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02099277473601603921noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20218451.post-1159501642824480992006-09-29T11:47:00.000+08:002006-09-29T11:47:00.000+08:00While I really like the idea of DP (dual processor...While I really like the idea of DP (dual processor) PC, with each CPU having two cores (i.e. dual core), I just hate when some FanBoy like Rahul said it'll give a birth to a new kind of enthusiast. Hey, people can use DP-server already and even people at XS have been using I-Will mobos to overclock DP Xeon and no, Intel didn't even call the platform anything new except call it like a normal "workstation" PC.<BR/><BR/>So I don't see why A* should claim giving birth to a new kind of "enthusiasts", they are already here, and true enthusiasts have already acknowledged their existence, no need for A* to make them known.death_metalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02099277473601603921noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20218451.post-1159376516238639332006-09-28T01:01:00.000+08:002006-09-28T01:01:00.000+08:00hehe, even if their chip runs a native quad, fact ...hehe, even if their chip runs a native quad, fact remains that Core micro-architecture still pwnz K8L.. no matter what letter they attach to it, K8 is still ol' inferior K8 :)<BR/><BR/>besides, no one really cares if Intel uses 2 x dual-cores on their quads.. as long as it works GREAT.. can't say the same for K8L native quads though (and to think, native quads are supposed to be faster :P).. it all boils down to the superior execution core, and that's.. uhm.. 'core' :DAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com